Should every nation have freedom of religion?

Source: Time Magazine, April 3, 2006

In America, we have certain freedoms extended to our citizenry known as our first amendment rights. These freedoms include many elements that are central to our country that often we take for granted like freedom of the press, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and freedom of religion. The freedom of religion prohibits Congress from establishing an official religion in the U.S. This allows Americans to practice religion as they wish.

This is not the case in other countries of the world. Religion is sometimes incorporated into the laws of a country and anything but strict adherence the letter of the law is often punishable by death. Two examples of religion incorporated into a society's law are Kim Jung Il requiring all citizens to worship him and Shari'a law in many predominantly Muslim countries.

An example of Shari'a law in action was the recent news report of 41 year-old Abdul Rahman of Afghanistan. Afghanistan operates under Shari'a law, under such a system to renounce one's Muslim faith is a crime punishable by death. Rahman was on trial in Kabul, Afghanistan for such a crime. In converting to Christianity from the Muslim faith, he violated this tenet of Islamic law. Outcry from Christians everywhere, especially in America, was partly responsible for Rahman release from charges and current asylum in Italy.

Should freedom of religion be a basic freedom for everyone everywhere? Are there advantages to a set system of religion for a society? Let me know what you think.